Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description
Italy’s goals against Germany in the 119th minute of the world cup semifinal.
Video information
This FIFA World Cup 2006’s video is titled Italy& goal and credited to napoli001. Viewing time is 00:01:55, enjoy our fellow FIFA World Cup fans!
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description Timothy Filiga Cahill, born 6 December…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2018’s video summary and description Toni Kroos cinematic goal for Germany…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2014’s video summary and description World Cup 2014: Germany’s unforgettable triumph…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description Timothy Filiga…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description Portugal Vs…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description Alessandro Del…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description Iconic goal…
Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2006’s video summary and description football #dribbling…
andiamo a berlino pepe
germany, france, everyone LOSER except ITALY
Your arguement is the only thing that is "bull".
In 2002 Brasil were by far the best team there. They were not very tight at the back but they were one of the greatest attacking Brasil teams in recent memory. Everybody remembers the Ronaldo/Rivaldo/Ronaldinho Brasil team. And lets not forget the great full back pairing of Cafu and Roberto Carlos. To compare that team to Italy, who lets face it beat a poor German team here (they only got to the semi on host advantage) is unfair and unjust.
I would like to know what was "controversial" about Brasil's victory in 2002?
Germany's LUCKY run to the final that year was controversial. (Paraguay 0-1 Germany, Quarter Final USA 0-1 Germany, Semi Final South Korea 0-1 Germany- easiest run to the final EVER). South Korea's run to the semi was controversial (Dodgy reffing against Spain and Italy). Brasil's win was NOT controversial.
LordAntWarrior — why are you watching an Italian video if you're a fan of Brazil? Please stick to watching videos of your wonderfully fortunate team win meaningless World Cups.
And to answer your pathetic excuse for a response. The Brazilian team of '02 was called into question by one Pele for their unattractive attacking style. And we're fortunate to even qualify for the tournament.
Brazil's road to the final (Turkey, China, Costa Rica, Belgium, England, Turkey and then Germany). Does that sound tougher than Italy's in '06? If that team had faced either Italy or Spain in the final, they would have been in big trouble.
And moreover the '06 Brazilians were dubbed the strongest Brazilian team in recent memory.
They were easily tossed aside by France. And to further respond to your ignorance. Germany was the strongest team in the tournament in '06.
Italy was playing Germany in a stadium that they had never lost in since its creation. And still they came up with a stunning 2-0 victory.
Face it — Italy going into the tournament was severely under rated — and had allowed very few goals to some strong competition (Czech Republic, USA, Ukraine, Germany, France). And if you want to make fun of the teams mentioned — two of them knocked off Brazil and Argentine.
Get over it — Italy is the champions, and Brazil isn't. No matter what you say!
ps. Lord Ant — Forza Italia!
First and foremost I am NOT a Brasil fan. I was born in England and the only national team I support is my them. But let's leave England out of this because the less said about my own national team the better. I fondly remember the 2002 World Cup and in my opinion that Brasil team were the best Brasil team since at least the 80's with Socrates etc. And that's saying something considering the 94 team won the World Cup as well.
Your argument against the 2002 Brasil team is very flawed since you claim they played ugly attacking football yet that is exactly the style that Italy played in 2006 and continue to do so. And it is even worse because Italy are far more defensive minded.
The 2002 tournament was a unique one in that none of the big teams were really any good- Argentina/Portugal/France out in the group stage, Italy and Spain eliminated by S Korea, England bottling it again.
Like I say, Korea's run to the semi final was extremely dubious, and so Italy and Spain probarbly should have progressed further. But even so, you can't argue that either of the two played outstandingly well anyway- Italy only gained 4 points in thier group!
So if Brasil were "controversial winners" (as continentalop99 said) then who, in your opinion should have won it?
And as for your argument that Brasil had an easier road than Germany: If you consider Paraguay, USA and Korea bigger tests than Belgium, England and Turkey then you really don't know your stuff as much as you'd like to think. Sure, BOTH teams should have had harder paths to the final, but how was that possible when most of the big teams were already out?!?
In regards to the 06 Brasil team- what does that have to do with this argument? Like I say, I am not a Brasil fan, so any insult against Brasil means nothing to me. I am the first to say that on paper, the 06 team should have licked everybody there. But the game isn't played on paper, and they deservedly lost. They weren't even a hundredth of the attacking team the 02 Brasil team was.
@gabem2009 yea… its been quite a surprise eh 😉