Sporati on FIFA World Cup 2010’s video summary and description
Footage from the 1966 World Cup final pitting West Germany against England. Did Geoff Hurst score? It seems he did, but nobody …
Video information
This FIFA World Cup 2010’s video is titled World Cup 1966 – Geoff Hurst's Controversial Goal in Color and credited to Panah. Viewing time is 00:00:36, enjoy our fellow FIFA World Cup fans!
Il n'y a pas but mais le karma a rattrapé l'Angleterre lors de son match contre l'Argentine.
Parfois il y a une justice.
The Real rigged world cup. ?
There were and old film where you can see chalk after the ball hits the line… that would clearly mark that the ball didn’t cross the line.
Definetly shouldnt have been a goal. However, justice was served in 2010 via Lampard.
Tofiq bahramooov
It's colour (with a letter 'u')
The ball only lands once – pause it when it makes contact with the line. It's never, ever over the line.
3-2…
English people should be thankful to Mr. Bakhramov.
Var before it started on the screens:bro what was it
VAR after:it looks like a goal but it’s not
the tilkowski's reaction? 0:30
It was awarded a goal because the overwhelming majority of the possibility ball ?? was fully in during the time it hit the crossbar to the time it landed on the ground supports the decision: GOAL!
Have I crossed the line
This + Maradona's hand were the most outrageous steals in history
That was very similar to the Zidane penalty. .
This is the clearest and biggest robbery on a Final World Cup ever by a large margin.,
Roger Hunt should have attacked the rebound to eliminate all doubt but he stopped. A rookie mistake and he got real lucky.
Karma for the three African lions
Rule it out and we still won 3-2. Does this settle it?
England got the benefit of a ball that never crossed the line.
The linesman has testicles for eyeballs if he saw the ball cross…. No way!
Only Limeys think it was a legit goal.
The rest of the world knows it wasn't.
goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooal
I think the ball is at least 1m across the line. A very clear goal. I don't understand where everbody is talking about….
It was clearly coal.
Scandalo mondiale!!!
It definitely does not look like a goal!
El VAR del video se parece al que se usa en el fútbol Argentino
It's not a goal, the Azerbaijani referee is not even on the line and makes a ridiculous decision
No goal- the linesman was from the USSR who had just lost to West Germany in the semis
England cheat 1966
Argentina 1986
Tbh if it was your country you would have backed it was in. England is just not very liked.
And England fans cry bout 2010
The shocking thing is how slow that defender was.
Watching this is Euro 2024 after England wrongly won Netherland's vs England match and one attempt at a goal by England was disallowed because a Netherlands player STOPPED THE BALL DEAD ON THE LINE. ON THE LINE was NOT a goal, but it was counted in '66. Even before this, I didn't think it was fair England won that World Cup. And I'm English. Yeah, only 58 years before it was ultimately proved that ON the line IS NOT counted as OVER the line.
The Curse Stays active 14.07.2024
Here after Euro 2024 final. As an Italian of course i've supported the winner Spain after the elimination of Italy. England never gonna win a Mondial or European competition after this shameful scam victory. ??
Here after Euro final…..The curse stays as always?. Kuddos to England.
Scandalo
And they still criticise Hand of God .
The most egregious thing is that you NEVER award a goal unless you are certain. And there was no way to know so a bullcrap call by the ref….
You have to be an English hater to say that world cup was robbed.
I'm neither British, nor German, nor Argentinian.
Objectively:
1. The ball is clearly behind the line and it is a goal
2. If you nullify that goal, they would still win 3:2. A clear and deserved win
3. To think that Germany deserved it is not true. They were just lucky to be in the final
4. If you think that this win was a cheat you have to admit that Germany cheated even more in 1954
5. If you think that this goal wasn't, then that one by Maradona with the hand in 1986 it's not either
Otherwise you're just an hater. So it doesn't matter what haters says
Doesnt really matter because it finished 4 2 plus if you look at the German equalizer before full time there was a handball before it was scored.
Okay deduct the goal ?
No goal
Wasn't a goal the ball didn't cross the line fully
Leaving a comment here after England lost in 2024
I will come back to this comment every two years to remind England of what cheats they are
Karma for this robbery came back in ‘86 courtesy of Maradona ?
Diego Maradona (his Scottish interview) brought me here.
Yes, Diego was right. It was NOT a goal.
A journalist asked him about his 'hand of God' goal and he said that England got a free goal and therefore, he shouldn't be judge when it comes to his 'hand of God' goal.
As bayraklar? ?????????????????? Tofigg